[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
re: Does "options P1003_1B_SEMAPHORE" still exist?
> At the time I filed the PRs they were contested by AD because the libc
> counterparts were already documented, with the syscalls considered the
> private interface. I personally believe that all syscalls should be
> documented in NetBSD (and recently I have learned that I'm not the only
> one to think they should be, so perhaps I should eventually write these
> manual pages, afterall).
indeed, i'd much rather all the syscalls were documented.
Main Index |
Thread Index |