Re: [patch] put Lua standard libraries into the kernel

To: Marc Balmer <marc%msys.ch@localhost>
Subject: Re: [patch] put Lua standard libraries into the kernel
From: Alexander Nasonov <alnsn%yandex.ru@localhost>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 21:55:08 +0000

Marc Balmer wrote:
> If they are, then of course the standard functions like luaL_openlibs()
> are used.  So this not about a replacement mechanism for
> luaL_openlibs(), but to control whether luaL_openlibs() is called or not.

Yes, I understand this but I don't understand why to you need a special
control for it. It's your choice as a programmer to call that function
or not to call. Why do you need a special variable/syscal to control this?

Alex

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] put Lua standard libraries into the kernel
  - From: Alexander Nasonov

References:
- [patch] put Lua standard libraries into the kernel
  - From: Lourival Vieira Neto
- Re: [patch] put Lua standard libraries into the kernel
  - From: Marc Balmer
- Re: [patch] put Lua standard libraries into the kernel
  - From: Lourival Vieira Neto
- Re: [patch] put Lua standard libraries into the kernel
  - From: Marc Balmer
- Re: [patch] put Lua standard libraries into the kernel
  - From: dieter roelants
- Re: [patch] put Lua standard libraries into the kernel
  - From: Martin Husemann
- Re: [patch] put Lua standard libraries into the kernel
  - From: Marc Balmer
- Re: [patch] put Lua standard libraries into the kernel
  - From: Alexander Nasonov
- Re: [patch] put Lua standard libraries into the kernel
  - From: Marc Balmer

Prev by Date: Re: [patch] put Lua standard libraries into the kernel
Next by Date: Re: [patch] put Lua standard libraries into the kernel
Previous by Thread: Re: [patch] put Lua standard libraries into the kernel
Next by Thread: Re: [patch] put Lua standard libraries into the kernel
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index