[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: MACHINE_ARCH on NetBSD/evbearmv6hf-el current
On Oct 26, 2013, at 10:54 AM, Izumi Tsutsui <tsutsui%ceres.dti.ne.jp@localhost>
>>> By static MACHINE_ARCH, or dynamic sysctl(3)?
>>> If dynamic sysctl(3) is prefered, which node?
>> which has been defined for a long long time.
> Yes, defined before sf vs hf issue arised, and
> you have changed the definition (i.e. make it dynamic)
> without public discussion. That's the problem.
It was already dynamic (it changes for compat_netbsd32).
Main Index |
Thread Index |