tech-kern archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: MACHINE_ARCH on NetBSD/evbearmv6hf-el current

> > By static MACHINE_ARCH, or dynamic sysctl(3)?
> > If dynamic sysctl(3) is prefered, which node?
> hw.machine_arch
> which has been defined for a long long time.

Yes, defined before sf vs hf issue arised, and
you have changed the definition (i.e. make it dynamic)
without public discussion.  That's the problem.

Izumi Tsutsui

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index