[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: MACHINE_ARCH on NetBSD/evbearmv6hf-el current
> > By static MACHINE_ARCH, or dynamic sysctl(3)?
> > If dynamic sysctl(3) is prefered, which node?
> which has been defined for a long long time.
Yes, defined before sf vs hf issue arised, and
you have changed the definition (i.e. make it dynamic)
without public discussion. That's the problem.
Main Index |
Thread Index |