[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: core statement on fexecve, O_EXEC, and O_SEARCH
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 03:12:36PM +0000, David Holland wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 01:49:09AM +0300, Alan Barrett wrote:
> > If necessary, the open(2) syscall could be versioned so that
> > O_RDONLY is no longer defined as zero.
> This seems possibly worth doing to avoid all the annoyance with
> FREAD/FWRITE vs. O_RDONLY/O_WRONLY, but I really don't see how it's
> connected to the rest...
oops, too early in the morning, disregard the last part.
David A. Holland
Main Index |
Thread Index |