Re: core statement on fexecve, O_EXEC, and O_SEARCH

[David Holland <dholland-tech%netbsd.org@localhost>]

On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 03:12:36PM +0000, David Holland wrote:
 > On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 01:49:09AM +0300, Alan Barrett wrote:
 >  > If necessary, the open(2) syscall could be versioned so that
 >  > O_RDONLY is no longer defined as zero.
 > 
 > This seems possibly worth doing to avoid all the annoyance with
 > FREAD/FWRITE vs. O_RDONLY/O_WRONLY, but I really don't see how it's
 > connected to the rest...

oops, too early in the morning, disregard the last part.

-- 
David A. Holland
dholland%netbsd.org@localhost