[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: core statement on fexecve, O_EXEC, and O_SEARCH
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 01:49:09AM +0300, Alan Barrett wrote:
> If necessary, the open(2) syscall could be versioned so that
> O_RDONLY is no longer defined as zero.
This seems possibly worth doing to avoid all the annoyance with
FREAD/FWRITE vs. O_RDONLY/O_WRONLY, but I really don't see how it's
connected to the rest...
David A. Holland
Main Index |
Thread Index |