[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
re: [RFC][PATCH] _UC_TLSBASE for all ports
> > Yes, I dislike it being used, because it breaks perfectly valid
> > assumptions like lwpid being constant across the life time of a thread.
> Therefore I do not understand why you oppose the proposal of proposing a
> MI interface to let the user opt out of that bad behavior.
i'm confused how the _UC_* interface can be considered "public".
the whole point of them being _* is that they're private to the
implementation, and depending on them is wrong.
i'm not sure where i stand on this issue, but if this is to be
used in 3rd party code we should publish definitions that do
not start with "_".
Main Index |
Thread Index |