re: [RFC][PATCH] _UC_TLSBASE for all ports

[matthew green <mrg%eterna.com.au@localhost>]

> > Yes, I dislike it being used, because it breaks perfectly valid
> > assumptions like lwpid being constant across the life time of a thread.
> 
> Therefore I do not understand why you oppose the proposal of proposing a
> MI interface to let the user opt out of that bad behavior.

i'm confused how the _UC_* interface can be considered "public".
the whole point of them being _* is that they're private to the
implementation, and depending on them is wrong.

i'm not sure where i stand on this issue, but if this is to be
used in 3rd party code we should publish definitions that do
not start with "_".


.mrg.