Re: [RFC][PATCH] _UC_TLSBASE for all ports

To: joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost (Joerg Sonnenberger), tech-kern%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] _UC_TLSBASE for all ports
From: manu%netbsd.org@localhost (Emmanuel Dreyfus)
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 15:42:59 +0200

Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost> wrote:

> Yes, I dislike it being used, because it breaks perfectly valid
> assumptions like lwpid being constant across the life time of a thread.

Therefore I do not understand why you oppose the proposal of proposing a
MI interface to let the user opt out of that bad behavior.

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
manu%netbsd.org@localhost

Follow-Ups:
- re: [RFC][PATCH] _UC_TLSBASE for all ports
  - From: matthew green
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] _UC_TLSBASE for all ports
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger

References:
- Re: [RFC][PATCH] _UC_TLSBASE for all ports
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH] _UC_TLSBASE for all ports
Next by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH] _UC_TLSBASE for all ports
Previous by Thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH] _UC_TLSBASE for all ports
Next by Thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH] _UC_TLSBASE for all ports
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index