Re: zero runtime when negative

[Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>]

On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 09:05:20PM +0000, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> In article <4FF09C68.6000603%gmail.com@localhost>,
> Adam Hoka  <adam.hoka%gmail.com@localhost> wrote:
> >
> >I plan to commit this if there are no good reasons or suggestions for an
> >alternative solution.
> >
> >I think it doesn't hide the problem, as it still prints a warning as it
> >used to. The only thing it removes is the bogus message about killing
> >the process.
> >
> 
> I don't see this as an improvement. It duplicates code, and it does not
> explain why the monotonic clock is going backwards.

Agreed. The best option might be to just blacklist the time counter the
first time this happens...

Joerg