Re: zero runtime when negative

[christos%astron.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)]

In article <4FF09C68.6000603%gmail.com@localhost>,
Adam Hoka  <adam.hoka%gmail.com@localhost> wrote:
>
>I plan to commit this if there are no good reasons or suggestions for an
>alternative solution.
>
>I think it doesn't hide the problem, as it still prints a warning as it
>used to. The only thing it removes is the bogus message about killing
>the process.
>

I don't see this as an improvement. It duplicates code, and it does not
explain why the monotonic clock is going backwards.

christos