Re: ENOATTR vs ENODATA

To: jeanyves.migeon%free.fr@localhost (Jean-Yves Migeon)
Subject: Re: ENOATTR vs ENODATA
From: manu%netbsd.org@localhost (Emmanuel Dreyfus)
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 21:32:44 +0200

Jean-Yves Migeon <jeanyves.migeon%free.fr@localhost> wrote:

> What came up from the Linux vs FreeBSD extended attributes conventions?
> I can't remember if a clear path was chosen, and the archives do not 
> point to anything obvious (at least to me)

The Linux API allows you to add arbitrary namespaces without a hitch.
You need to patch the kernel to do the same with the FreeBSD API.

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
manu%netbsd.org@localhost

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ENOATTR vs ENODATA
  - From: Jean-Yves Migeon

References:
- Re: ENOATTR vs ENODATA
  - From: Jean-Yves Migeon

Prev by Date: error in sys/cdefs.h ?
Next by Date: Re: ENOATTR vs ENODATA
Previous by Thread: Re: ENOATTR vs ENODATA
Next by Thread: Re: ENOATTR vs ENODATA
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index