tech-kern archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: ENOATTR vs ENODATA

To: plunky%rya-online.net@localhost (Iain Hibbert)
Subject: Re: ENOATTR vs ENODATA
From: manu%netbsd.org@localhost (Emmanuel Dreyfus)
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 19:53:50 +0200

Iain Hibbert <plunky%rya-online.net@localhost> wrote:

> I used the ENOATTR symbol in some bluetooth related code

I did not notice it. Removing ENOATTR is therefore not possible since it
will break bluetooth userland code. 

I can still turn extended attribute ENOATTR return code into ENODATA.

-- 
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
manu%netbsd.org@localhost

References:
- Re: ENOATTR vs ENODATA
  - From: Iain Hibbert

Prev by Date: Re: ENOATTR vs ENODATA
Next by Date: Re: add disk size to "struct disk"?
Previous by Thread: Re: ENOATTR vs ENODATA
Next by Thread: error in sys/cdefs.h ?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index