[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: VFS reclaims are scarce on netbsd-6
On Apr 13, 2012, at 1:41 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> I run my perfuse/glusterfs tests on netbsd-6 branch, and I noticed that
> I reclaims operations can lag for a long time. After running for a
> while, perfused knows about 25217 nodes, most of them idle for hours.
> Then kernel will start sending reclaims for old nodes when it wants to
> lookup a new one.
VFS will cache up to kern.maxvnodes vnodes before it starts reclaiming
vnodes to make space for new ones.
> Is this an intended behavior? That consumes perfused and glusterfsd
> memory for no benefit.
Why is there no benefit of cached nodes?
> Do I have a way to tell the kernel I would like a
> more aggressive recycling policy?
You could lower kern.maxvnodes then ...
Juergen Hannken-Illjes - hannken%eis.cs.tu-bs.de@localhost - TU Braunschweig
Main Index |
Thread Index |