tech-kern archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: 4.x -> 5.x locking?
>> membar_sync();
>> mutex_exit(mtx);
> mutex_enter and mutex_exit are implicit memory barriers (reads and
> writes respectively are not allowed to be reordered).
Oh! Thank you. Has that made it into mutex(9) in -current? If not, I
offer my opinion that it should.
Does mutex_exit also implicitly push writes to main RAM, or whatever
else is necessary to make them visible to other CPUs? (A reordering
barrier does not necessarily imply a global visibility barrier.)
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse%rodents-montreal.org@localhost
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index