Re: core's decision on modular kernels

To: tech-kern%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Re: core's decision on modular kernels
From: David Young <dyoung%pobox.com@localhost>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 10:08:02 -0500

On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 08:53:53AM +0100, David Laight wrote:
> What is the difference between MONOLITHIC and MODULAR with 'built-in'
> modules? And wouldn't the latter be a better aim??

I think that by MODULAR with built-in modules, you mean a barebones
kernel linked with some .kmod's?  I would love to see that.  What has to
happen to make it so?

Dave

-- 
David Young             OJC Technologies
dyoung%ojctech.com@localhost      Urbana, IL * (217) 344-0444 x24

Follow-Ups:
- Re: core's decision on modular kernels
  - From: David Laight

References:
- core's decision on modular kernels
  - From: Alan Barrett
- Re: core's decision on modular kernels
  - From: Martin S. Weber
- Re: core's decision on modular kernels
  - From: Alan Barrett
- Re: core's decision on modular kernels
  - From: David Laight

Prev by Date: Re: dom0 lockdebug panic
Next by Date: wapbl module
Previous by Thread: Re: core's decision on modular kernels
Next by Thread: Re: core's decision on modular kernels
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index