[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: core's decision on modular kernels
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 07:55:38AM +0200, Alan Barrett wrote:
> Accordingly, we propose the following policy for the immediate
> future. We expect that it will be appropriate to re-evaluate this
> policy as the state of modular support changes later.
> - All ports using modules should provide all three of MODULAR,
> MONOLITHIC, and GENERIC kernels.
> - A port's MONOLITHIC kernel should include features that
> traditionally would have been present in a non-modular GENERIC
> kernel, and it may or may not include "options MODULAR", at the
> portmaster's discretion.
Huh? Would it be possible please to get a more detailed rationale
behind allowing "options MODULAR" in a MONOLITHIC kernel, if all
ports using modules already offer MODULAR and GENERIC?
Thanks in advance,
Main Index |
Thread Index |