Re: Where are the specific WARNS=n defined?

To: tech-kern%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Re: Where are the specific WARNS=n defined?
From: Mouse <mouse%Rodents-Montreal.ORG@localhost>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 01:21:16 -0400 (EDT)

>> [...] gcc errors due to comparison of signed and unsigned values.

> It is best to fix the errors.

What errors?

It is not necessarily an error to compare signed and unsigned values.
In my experience, that warning produces so many more false positives
than useful warnings that I normally shut it off entirely.

/~\ The ASCII                             Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTML                mouse%rodents-montreal.org@localhost
/ \ Email!           7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Where are the specific WARNS=n defined?
  - From: Christos Zoulas
- Re: Where are the specific WARNS=n defined?
  - From: Iain Hibbert

References:
- Where are the specific WARNS=n defined?
  - From: Paul Goyette
- Re: Where are the specific WARNS=n defined?
  - From: Christos Zoulas

Prev by Date: Re: Where are the specific WARNS=n defined?
Next by Date: Re: Adding pulse support to gpio(4), gpioctl(8)
Previous by Thread: Re: Where are the specific WARNS=n defined?
Next by Thread: Re: Where are the specific WARNS=n defined?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index