tech-kern archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: fcntl() F_GETLK semantics vs. test t_vnops.c

J. Hannken-Illjes wrote:
> As any program relying on a special order is not portable I would suggest to
> either remove this test or change it as appended testing overlap only.

I've changed the test to find all locks regardless of an internal
ordering of locks in the kernel. The test passes now.


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index