[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: extended attributes
Thor Lancelot Simon <tls%panix.com@localhost> wrote:
> If what you're saying is that the attribute store writes are not treated
> with the same integrity guarantees as other metadata writes, and, worse,
> that the datastructures they're stored in are not designed to be robust
> against corruption at least such that the system does not crash if it
> encounters, let's say, a truncated attribute store -- that sounds to me
> like such a severe design and implementation bug that this feature should
> be removed from the source tree.
Well I do not know if it is less robust, but I can tell I managed to
corrupt it to the point the root could not be mounted anymore.
> Is FreeBSD's FFSv2 attribute code similarly fragile? A lot of people
> seem to be using it. Maybe it would be a better path forward for us.
FFSv2 does not use file as backing store, the attribute are said to be
"native". I suspect it is indeed more robust. I would be happy if
someone is ready to import that code.
Main Index |
Thread Index |