Re: statvfs() sleeps forever on tstile

[David Holland <dholland-tech%netbsd.org@localhost>]

On Sun, May 08, 2011 at 10:45:15PM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote:
 > For example this is from an i386 5.1 machine:
 > [snip]
 > 
 > This is a FFSv1 file system (called UFS1 in the dumpfs output), but the
 > superblock is in FFSv2 format.
 > 
 > Compare to this:
 > [snip]
 > 
 > Here we have a FFSv2 file system, and are using the FFSv2
 > superblock as well.

Should we change the dumpfs output to be more consistent with the
terminology we're trying to use?

-- 
David A. Holland
dholland%netbsd.org@localhost