Re: ata(4) and NCQ

To: Jonathan Stone <kiwi_jonathan%yahoo.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: ata(4) and NCQ
From: Andriy Gapon <avg%FreeBSD.org@localhost>
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 14:32:08 +0300

on 20/04/2011 03:38 Jonathan Stone said the following:
> Also that both FreeBSD and Linux took the plunge and handle ATA drives through
> their SCSI mid-layer.  I agree, that code is big; but maybe that alternative 
> is
> worth examiining, too.

AFAIK, (Open)Solaris did the same.
And to clarify: you are actually talking about CAM layer.  Yes, previously CAM
layer was only used for SCSI.

-- 
Andriy Gapon

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ata(4) and NCQ
  - From: Manuel Bouyer

References:
- Re: ata(4) and NCQ
  - From: Thor Lancelot Simon
- Re: ata(4) and NCQ
  - From: Jonathan Stone

Prev by Date: Re: ata(4) and NCQ
Next by Date: Re: GNU vs C99 extern inline
Previous by Thread: Re: ata(4) and NCQ
Next by Thread: Re: ata(4) and NCQ
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index