[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Softfloat userland needing to properly deliver SIGFPE traps
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 10:06:09AM -0800, Matt Thomas wrote:
> I'm thinking the check should go away.
How about the variant below - it allows a process to deliver arbitrary
signals to itself, but only SI_USER/SI_QUEUE variants to foreign processes.
Perhaps the whole part inside the new if () block should be hidden in
kauth instead, but I don't feel like touching that mess right now.
> One thing I'm concerned about is whether this signal will directed to
> the queueing lwp. Seems to me that for a synthetic fault like this,
> that would need to be true.
Yes, do we have means to do that already?
Main Index |
Thread Index |