[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: ioctl(2) vs sys/ioctl.h
On Sat, 18 Dec 2010, der Mouse wrote:
> >> int ioctl(int, unsigned long, ...);
> > Most of our ioctl's take pointer arguments. Some streams ioctls
> > though take int arguments (ioctl(fd, I_FLUSH, FLUSHR) for example)
> > and using void * as the argument would not compile cleanly.
> Must FLUSHR (to continue your example) be defined as an int value?
it seems to be a flag
> I'm just brainstorming possible ways to avoid inflicting a varargs
> declaration on all users of ioctl.
they already have it, see <sys/ioctl.h> and
Main Index |
Thread Index |