[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Debugging threaded processes -- ptrace proposal
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 04:37:47PM -0400, Paul Koning wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 04:02:02PM -0400, Paul Koning wrote:
> > >
> > > It's probably not all that big a job to backport my change to GDB
> > 6.x.
> > > For that matter, anyone else can do that once I contribute the
> > to
> > > the current GDB.
> > Actually, there's another problem. If you contribute copyright in
> > change to FSF, and that's the only way you're going to distribute it,
> > it
> > will end up available under GPLv3 only and thus unuseful for backport
> > to
> > the GPLv2 GDB in NetBSD. :-/
> Oops. You're right.
> It looks like the backport is pretty straightforward. I'll take a look
> at the current GDB that NetBSD is using. I could post the diffs along
> with the kernel proposal.
That would be fantastic. I hope you can eventually make that version of
the diff available under a license compatible with either GPLv2 or a
BSD-style license, just to clear up any ambiguity.
Thor Lancelot Simon
"All of my opinions are consistent, but I cannot present them all
at once." -Jean-Jacques Rousseau, On The Social Contract
Main Index |
Thread Index |