tech-kern archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: removing aiboost(4) as redundant

To: Constantine Aleksandrovich Murenin <C++%Cns.SU@localhost>
Subject: Re: removing aiboost(4) as redundant
From: Thomas Klausner <wiz%netbsd.org@localhost>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:05:14 +0100

On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 03:04:12PM -0500, Constantine Aleksandrovich Murenin 
wrote:
> Dx actually stands for DragonFly, although as noted, the note would
> apply equally well, if not better, to Linux.  Perhaps it would be time
> to add support for .Dx to NetBSD's mdoc? :-)

Fine with me. Do you have a diff? :)
 Thomas

References:
- removing aiboost(4) as redundant
  - From: Constantine Aleksandrovich Murenin
- Re: removing aiboost(4) as redundant
  - From: Christoph Egger
- Re: removing aiboost(4) as redundant
  - From: Jukka Ruohonen
- Re: removing aiboost(4) as redundant
  - From: Paul Goyette
- Re: removing aiboost(4) as redundant
  - From: Constantine Aleksandrovich Murenin

Prev by Date: Re: (Semi-random) thoughts on device tree structure and devfs
Next by Date: Re: (Semi-random) thoughts on device tree structure and devfs
Previous by Thread: Re: removing aiboost(4) as redundant
Next by Thread: Re: removing aiboost(4) as redundant
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index