Re: removing aiboost(4) as redundant

[Paul Goyette <paul%whooppee.com@localhost>]

On Sat, 6 Mar 2010, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:

> On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 07:57:16AM +0100, Christoph Egger wrote:
> > On 06.03.10 07:47, Constantine Aleksandrovich Murenin wrote:
> > > The attached patch completely disconnects aiboost(4) from the tree. Also
> > > removed will be files src/sys/dev/acpi/aiboost.c and
> > > src/share/man/man4/aiboost.4.
> >
> > Fine with me. No objection from my side.
>
> Ditto. Though I still think it should use kmem_alloc(9)... The man-page is
> nice too, but I wonder should this be removed:
>
>     "[...]  Whereas on OpenBSD the native drivers have to be specifically
>     disabled should their presence be judged unnecessary, on the lm(4) and
>     it(4) are not probed provided that acpi(4) is configured and the system
>     potentially supports the hardware monitoring chip through ACPI."

Yes I think it should be removed.

However, if we leave it, then we need to replace the "on .Dx the" with 
the proper OS name (Linux?)!

:)


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   Paul Goyette   | PGP DSS Key fingerprint: |  E-mail addresses:      |
| Customer Service | FA29 0E3B 35AF E8AE 6651 |  paul at whooppee.com   |
| Network Engineer | 0786 F758 55DE 53BA 7731 | pgoyette at juniper.net |
| Kernel Developer |                          | pgoyette at netbsd.org  |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------