[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: (Semi-random) thoughts on device tree structure and devfs
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 06:34:54PM +0000, Iain Hibbert wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > > Sorry I got confused - in your method, what is dk3 needed for?
> > It is still the device, the rest are just symlinks.
> do you propose to do away with sd0a then?
That's a very good question. Right now you can decide whether you want
to use the disklabel approach or wedges. I don't think we need both.
I think having the full disk (raw) device ((r)sd0d) and compat symlinks
to the wedges is good enough and would help eliminate quite a bit glue
in the existing drivers.
Main Index |
Thread Index |