[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: (Semi-random) thoughts on device tree structure and devfs
> Linux had a devfs and [dropped] it. Now it has udevd(8). Most
> likely the penguins had a reason for this.
Surely there are mailing list messages or something that outline that
reason? (Not that I have any idea where they'd be, but don't we have
at least a few people with feet in both camps?)
> udevd(8) gives the user land control over device enumeration. Maybe
> no bad idea. (Disclaimer: I don't like Linux.)
I think it probably is no bad idea. I don't like Linux either, but I
don't think it's so irremediably disastrous that there's nothing at all
NetBSD could learn from it.
> BTW: OSF/1 aka DEC-Unix aka Tru64-Unix did somthing like Linux +
> udevd(8) over 10 years ago.
Another reason to think that it's likely worth trying.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse%rodents-montreal.org@localhost
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
Main Index |
Thread Index |