[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: (Semi-random) thoughts on device tree structure and devfs
> Linux had a devfs and droped it. Now it has udevd(8). Most likely the
> penguins had a reason for this. udevd(8) gives the user land control
> over device enumeration. Maybe no bad idea. (Disclaimer: I don't like
I took a little glance at OpenSolaris/FreeBSD devfs man pages, and quickly
stopped. They're all overly complicated.
Those who complain about redundant device paths exposed should look at other
implementations. I don't really like to have /etc/devfsd.conf and bikeshed
Exposing device tree works, because NetBSD's hardware device abstraction is
done pretty much sanely (software abstraction has problems, tho).
> BTW: OSF/1 aka DEC-Unix aka Tru64-Unix did somthing like Linux +
> udevd(8) over 10 years ago.
Good point. We're hopelessly behind.
Masao Uebayashi / Tombi Inc. / Tel: +81-90-9141-4635
Main Index |
Thread Index |