[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: btuart and SOCKET Bluetooth CF
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010, KIYOHARA Takashi wrote:
> Is the efficiency that you think about a memory size? Or, is it a speed?
> The count of the m_adj() and the 'if (...)' is the same as you and me in
> the source of C. And, I leave efficiency to the compiler.
You didn't count the whole lifetime of that byte..
is cheaper than
if (mbuf is full)
m_adj(m, -1) /* (may need to scan mbuf chain) */
> I devised a different method. This executes processing to attach
> different according to cfdata->cf_atname.
I think depending on ldisc->l_name was cleaner. (no need for #ifdef)
in btuart_dtl_output_*(), M_WAITOK is not permitted, and m_copyback() can
fail, the result should be tested..
Main Index |
Thread Index |