[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: btuart and SOCKET Bluetooth CF
From: Iain Hibbert <plunky%rya-online.net@localhost>
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 17:49:28 +0000 (GMT)
> On Sat, 23 Jan 2010, KIYOHARA Takashi wrote:
> However, I'm not sure if it is permitted to use cfdata->cf_flags in this
> manner? There seem to be some rare instances of similar use but there is
> no mention in the API specification..
Oops. I can't agree your patch. :-<
DTL always has the header. It is a big penalty to check this by all
packets. And, btuart(4) is used perhaps on a very slow machine. So it
is a slow machine without usb(ubt(4)) perhaps.
# My main machine is hpcsh 100MHz with PCMCIA. ;-)
# It not have Cardbus and USB.
In my understanding, the cfdata->cf_flags is a flag that each driver
can use. You can find it used in arch/PORT/conf/GENERIC by wdc(4)
Main Index |
Thread Index |