Re: unhooking lfs from ufs

[David Holland <dholland-tech%netbsd.org@localhost>]

On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 09:18:05PM +0100, Adam Hamsik wrote:
 > Make LFS not compilable is the way to make it disappear very soon.

Did you read what I wrote? :-)

 > I think that these changes should happen in separate branch and
 > should be committed back to main branch only when it will be at
 > least compilable again.

That's already been done, except with a local/private branch on my
end.

-- 
David A. Holland
dholland%netbsd.org@localhost