[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: unhooking lfs from ufs
On Feb,Monday 8 2010, at 10:37 PM, Eduardo Horvath wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, Adam Hamsik wrote:
>> On Feb,Monday 8 2010, at 9:33 PM, Eduardo Horvath wrote:
>>> On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, Adam Hamsik wrote:
>>>> Are you sure that you can really finish this ? Currently you are working
>>>> on namei, ufs_lookup and many other issues. Make LFS not compilable is the
>>>> way to make it disappear very soon. I think that these changes should
>>>> happen in separate branch and should be committed back to main branch only
>>>> when it will be at least compilable again.
>>> s/compilable/reasonably solid/
>>> I'll be rather upset if my lfs partitions suddenly stop working.
>> LFS is not solid for a long time, now.
> The only problems I've been having with it resently are media errors.
What version of NetBSD are you using ? LFS is known to be broken after
vmlocking2 merge, because it heavily depended on kernel big lock model used
Main Index |
Thread Index |