Re: unhooking lfs from ufs

[Adam Hamsik <haaaad%gmail.com@localhost>]

On Feb,Monday 8 2010, at 10:37 PM, Eduardo Horvath wrote:

> On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, Adam Hamsik wrote:
> 
>> On Feb,Monday 8 2010, at 9:33 PM, Eduardo Horvath wrote:
>> 
>>> On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, Adam Hamsik wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Are you sure that you can really finish this ? Currently you are working 
>>>> on namei, ufs_lookup and many other issues. Make LFS not compilable is the 
>>>> way to make it disappear very soon. I think that these changes should 
>>>> happen in separate branch and should be committed back to main branch only 
>>>> when it will be at least compilable again. 
>>> 
>>> s/compilable/reasonably solid/
>>> 
>>> I'll be rather upset if my lfs partitions suddenly stop working.
>> 
>> LFS is not solid for a long time, now. 
> 
> The only problems I've been having with it resently are media errors.

What version of NetBSD are you using ? LFS is known to be broken after 
vmlocking2 merge, because it heavily depended on kernel big lock model used 
before.

Regards

Adam.