On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 04:14:18AM +0100, Adam Hamsik wrote: > > On Nov,Saturday 7 2009, at 5:45 PM, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote: > > >On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 11:29:42AM +0100, Adam Hamsik wrote: > >> > >>>You really don't want to use -O0, it will cause the code to be > >>>much, much larger, run much, much slower and use more stack. > >>>If it hides any bugs, when you change to -O2 for production use > >>>you'll have to debug the code again. > >> > >>Otherwise gcc will inline functions for me makes almost impossible to > >>find out what is going on. > > Thanks to help of many developers especially cube@ we have found > that this panic is caused by bug in a gcc which we use. To those who would raise an eyebrow to that somewhat bold assertion: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41990 -- Quentin Garnier - cube%cubidou.net@localhost - cube%NetBSD.org@localhost "See the look on my face from staying too long in one place [...] every time the morning breaks I know I'm closer to falling" KT Tunstall, Saving My Face, Drastic Fantastic, 2007.
Attachment:
pgpfLKZnVfnfh.pgp
Description: PGP signature