[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Improving RAIDframe Parity Handling: The Diff
Jed Davis <jld%panix.com@localhost> writes:
> Matthias Scheler <tron%zhadum.org.uk@localhost> writes:
>> From your patch it looks like it would be feasable to pull this
>> up into the "netbsd-5" branch. Can you see any reason why that
>> would not be possible?
> At one point I thought there was a reason, but looking over the diff I'm
> not sure what that might have been. I think I'll try merging it and see
> what happens.
What happens is that it builds cleanly, and minimal testing under QEMU
hasn't broken it.
Looking at the diff between my diffs revealed a mistake in the one I
originally posted -- I seem to have gotten a merge-with-HEAD wrong and
accidentally reverted r1.265 of rf_netbsdkintf.c.
So, here are new diffs:
I've checked that they both describe the same difference from their
respective branch heads.
(let ((C call-with-current-continuation)) (apply (lambda (x y) (x y)) (map
((lambda (r) ((C C) (lambda (s) (r (lambda l (apply (s s) l)))))) (lambda
(f) (lambda (l) (if (null? l) C (lambda (k) (display (car l)) ((f (cdr l))
(C k))))))) '((#\J #\d #\D #\v #\s) (#\e #\space #\a #\i #\newline)))))
Main Index |
Thread Index |