Re: Adding pool_cache_invalidate_local() to pool_cache(9) API

To: Jean-Yves Migeon <jeanyves.migeon%free.fr@localhost>
Subject: Re: Adding pool_cache_invalidate_local() to pool_cache(9) API
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej%shagadelic.org@localhost>
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2009 11:24:11 -0700

On Oct 10, 2009, at 3:41 AM, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:

> I will take look at other projects, perhaps they found a better solution.

I am looking at fixing the pool_cache_invalidate() behavior.

-- thorpej

References:
- Adding pool_cache_invalidate_local() to pool_cache(9) API
  - From: Jean-Yves Migeon
- Re: Adding pool_cache_invalidate_local() to pool_cache(9) API
  - From: Jason Thorpe
- Re: Adding pool_cache_invalidate_local() to pool_cache(9) API
  - From: Jean-Yves Migeon
- Re: Adding pool_cache_invalidate_local() to pool_cache(9) API
  - From: Jason Thorpe
- Re: Adding pool_cache_invalidate_local() to pool_cache(9) API
  - From: Manuel Bouyer
- Re: Adding pool_cache_invalidate_local() to pool_cache(9) API
  - From: Jason Thorpe
- Re: Adding pool_cache_invalidate_local() to pool_cache(9) API
  - From: Jean-Yves Migeon

Prev by Date: Re: vectorized fsyncv(2) syscall -- useful?
Next by Date: Re: vectorized fsyncv(2) syscall -- useful?
Previous by Thread: Re: Adding pool_cache_invalidate_local() to pool_cache(9) API
Next by Thread: Re: Adding pool_cache_invalidate_local() to pool_cache(9) API
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index