[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: uarea swap-out
David Laight <david%l8s.co.uk@localhost> wrote:
> > > - lwp_t::l_swaplock: worth leaving as a reserved field?
> > >
> > It is a struct, prefer to clean it up.
> Leaving as a pad avoids breaking binary comparibility.
- AFAIK, we cannot assume the size of struct kmutex, as it might differ
among architectures. Worth removal, rather than workaround.
- Currently, it is not a requirement, yet. It might/will be, to improve
modules support. But we need some plan before. A separate discussion. :)
Main Index |
Thread Index |