Re: NetBSD 5 STABLE wm0 panic

[SAITOH Masanobu <masanobu%iij.ad.jp@localhost>]

Hi.

 > On Wednesday 03 June 2009 09:34:37 Manuel Bouyer wrote:
 > > On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 09:57:07PM -0400, Chris Ross wrote:
 > > >   Hi there.  I see that this was pulled up into netbsd-5 approximately
 > > > Mar-21, but it looks like it has not been pulled to netbsd-5-0, even
 > > > though other things pulled to netbsd-5 more recently have also been
 > > > pulled to netbsd-5-0.
 > > >
 > > >   Does there need to be a specific request for this bug-fix to if_wm to
 > > > be pulled into netbsd-5-0?
 > >
 > > Yes. This is a major patch  which not only fixes your bug, but also adds
 > > new features. s such it's not really appropriate for netbsd-5-0.
 > >
 > > it would be better to have a patch which just fixes this issue for 5-0
 > 
 >   Right.  That makes perfect sense.

 This problem was pulled up to netbsd-5-0 branch two weeks ago, so
this bug will be fixed in 5.0.1.

        http://mail-index.netbsd.org/source-changes/2009/07/19/msg223208.html

 > > >   I'm running off of bouyer's patch now, and it's working just fine,
 > > > I'll rebuild a netbsd-5 kernel in the next few days and verify that that
 > > > works, but I don't anticipate any issues...
 > 
 >   I failed to respond to this, but as you would expect, an unmodified 
 > netbsd-5 
 > kernel works just fine on the machine that had the problematic wm in it.
 > 
 > > This has been pulled up as ticket 771
 > 
 >   Thanks.
 > 
 >                                          - Chris

----------------------------------------------------------
                SAITOH Masanobu (masanobu%iij.ad.jp@localhost
                                  msaitoh%netbsd.org@localhost)