Re: Syscalls documentation and librt

[Mindaugas Rasiukevicius <rmind%netbsd.org@localhost>]

Matthew Mondor <mm_lists%pulsar-zone.net@localhost> wrote:
> Reading the followup comments of misc/38979 suggests there's no
> concensus yet.  rmind closed the PR assuming I hadn't noticed section 3
> documentation, yet dholland seemed to agree that the documentation
> could be improved.

I agree that ideally everything should be documented. However, syscalls used
by libpthread (_lwp_*) and other ones you mention are not interfaces provided
for user. Personally, I would say that other documentation (eg. section 9) is
a higher priority at this moment.

-- 
Mindaugas