Re: Removal of some KAUTH_GENERIC_ISSUSER (pass 1)

[christos%astron.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)]

In article <49E0DBE2.8010008%NetBSD.org@localhost>, Elad Efrat  
<elad%NetBSD.org@localhost> wrote:
>Christos Zoulas wrote:
>
>> I think that the cases are going to be similar and I don't really want
>> to add more KAUTH_MACHDEP_FOO if I don't have to. I like KAUTH_MACHDEP_NVRAM
>> over KAUTH_MACHDEP_CMOS because it indicates the function not the underlying
>> technology.
>
>Alright, KAUTH_MACHDEP_NVRAM it is.
>
>Any comments regarding the rest of the diff?

The diff looks fine, but (in the non-diff case) I would prefer in the
default cases to deny instead.

christos