tech-kern archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Removal of some KAUTH_GENERIC_ISSUSER (pass 1)

To: Christos Zoulas <christos%astron.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: Removal of some KAUTH_GENERIC_ISSUSER (pass 1)
From: Elad Efrat <elad%NetBSD.org@localhost>
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 21:05:22 +0300

Christos Zoulas wrote:

I think that the cases are going to be similar and I don't really want
to add more KAUTH_MACHDEP_FOO if I don't have to. I like KAUTH_MACHDEP_NVRAM
over KAUTH_MACHDEP_CMOS because it indicates the function not the underlying
technology.


Alright, KAUTH_MACHDEP_NVRAM it is.

Any comments regarding the rest of the diff?

-e.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Removal of some KAUTH_GENERIC_ISSUSER (pass 1)
  - From: Christos Zoulas

References:
- Re: Removal of some KAUTH_GENERIC_ISSUSER (pass 1)
  - From: Elad Efrat
- Re: Removal of some KAUTH_GENERIC_ISSUSER (pass 1)
  - From: Izumi Tsutsui
- Re: Removal of some KAUTH_GENERIC_ISSUSER (pass 1)
  - From: Elad Efrat
- Re: Removal of some KAUTH_GENERIC_ISSUSER (pass 1)
  - From: Christos Zoulas

Prev by Date: Re: Removal of some KAUTH_GENERIC_ISSUSER (pass 1)
Next by Date: Re: Removal of some KAUTH_GENERIC_ISSUSER (pass 1)
Previous by Thread: Re: Removal of some KAUTH_GENERIC_ISSUSER (pass 1)
Next by Thread: Re: Removal of some KAUTH_GENERIC_ISSUSER (pass 1)
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index