[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: device module auto loading fix
On Apr,Wednesday 1 2009, at 11:30 AM, Antti Kantee wrote:
I haven't received any comments to this patch. I would like to commit
soon so if you have any pleas speak up.
Did you audit all existing callers and make sure the pseudo-errno
doesn't get passed to unexpected places, e.g. userspace? IMHO adding
an unexpected failure mode to a public interface is not a good idea.
I looked at bdev_open callers and there is only one in specfs.
With cdev_open it is much worse because there are some other callers
than in specfs .
After looking at cdev_open callers I'm really not sure if this is
do you have better suggestion ?
Main Index |
Thread Index |