[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Implementation of POSIX shared memory objects
> ad%netbsd.org@localhost wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:13:17AM +0000, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
> > > Any reads/writes? Apart from greater file-system overhead (as opposed to
> > > aobj), I think it can involve disks. :)
> > tmpfs == swap backed uao
> Right, but this is dependency on tmpfs, which one might not necessary want
> to have. I think it is not that friendly for embedded devices too.
while it can be, it doesn't need to be tmpfs. ie. same as /tmp.
> Best regards,
Main Index |
Thread Index |