[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Path to kmods
> ps: bias alert - I am one of those who doesn't much like dynamically
> linked kernels (whether they're called LKM's or MODULES or anything
> else). I also much favour end users doing kernel source compiles
> (not mandatory but highly recommended).
I'm in total agreement with kre here.
Based on the history of userland, I fully expect non-dynamically-linked
kernels to be desupported within some small number of years; people who
agree with kre and me might want to start preparing now for the
possibility that I'm right in that guess....
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse%rodents-montreal.org@localhost
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
Main Index |
Thread Index |