tech-kern archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Proposal: B_ARRIER (addresses wapbl performance?)

To: tech-kern%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: Proposal: B_ARRIER (addresses wapbl performance?)
From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 19:05:14 +0100

On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 06:47:38PM +0100, Havard Eidnes wrote:
> while this proposal sounds useful on the surface of it, do you
> know whether it will have any impact on the problem described in
> PR#39564, and if so, why?  Maybe I'm slow and need to be spoon-
> fed...

See the patch I just sent to current-users for a potential fix for that.

Joerg

References:
- Proposal: B_ARRIER (addresses wapbl performance?)
  - From: Thor Lancelot Simon
- Re: Proposal: B_ARRIER (addresses wapbl performance?)
  - From: Havard Eidnes

Prev by Date: Re: Proposal: B_ARRIER (addresses wapbl performance?)
Next by Date: Re: when can we tsleep() ?
Previous by Thread: Re: Proposal: B_ARRIER (addresses wapbl performance?)
Next by Thread: Re: Proposal: B_ARRIER (addresses wapbl performance?)
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index