Re: setsockopt() compat issue

To: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
Subject: Re: setsockopt() compat issue
From: Iain Hibbert <plunky%rya-online.net@localhost>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 18:12:04 +0100 (BST)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On Fri, 17 Oct 2008, Manuel Bouyer wrote:

> lets just hope there's no binary-only tools that would run into this :)
> It affects only 64bit platforms anyway ...

Out of interest, would this always affect 64-bit platforms?  I thought
somehow that they used 64-bit ints in any case in which case this would
not bite..

iain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (NetBSD)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJI+MdkAAoJEPFJxoMWDXVDBWAH/0Jkylh+7tlr6pTuJbuK3+al
3boIv6TtAN+rT5oqBlig6m7GXjpAq/xnYzp4w8CBNBxNUsXx6pYfvYROYkAgINtI
V9Xvsm1ZeRRJTIbGPznBq0geZRIrDx0UcRHewCnZYFCsYO2+M6diiJVZzJ6MXo86
NaTpqOlJdPGzh3sxLoEwUs5ZRUlx4cj+tuPx2VLDkzoVX/qiVgDaOXdtp99B51C6
fG1120+mCo2ETnmlhJXcuwl+uT48iAHkS63oj+PX4zenN/Mxflw0NQz6/QAWN2TJ
f4btEezgs4OzmxC1lwGepfl8JPgqsR2HYVPmDtU46Py1nLWsNK9783SIXm4J4Lg=
=4u5m
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Follow-Ups:
- Re: setsockopt() compat issue
  - From: der Mouse
- Re: setsockopt() compat issue
  - From: Manuel Bouyer

References:
- setsockopt() compat issue
  - From: Manuel Bouyer
- Re: setsockopt() compat issue
  - From: Iain Hibbert
- Re: setsockopt() compat issue
  - From: Manuel Bouyer

Prev by Date: Re: 3.1 USB panic
Next by Date: Re: Proposal for new syscalls: getrusagex and waitx
Previous by Thread: Re: setsockopt() compat issue
Next by Thread: Re: setsockopt() compat issue
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index