[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Status of revivesa
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 02:32:10PM +0200, Quentin Garnier wrote:
> > > The first point is not so bad; I don't even have any evidence such a
> > > bad application exists (but wandering around pkgsrc you see scary stuff
> > > though). As for the second one, it won't apply to 5.0 anyway, so we're
> > > safe for a while, and we might have a way out later (for instance, if we
> > > are to ever bump libc, we could bury SA again).
> > It would also be an issue only if you want to mix 3.0 and 4.0 userlands,
> > as I see it.
> So you would not add COMPAT_30_PTHREAD to GENERIC, and let the user
> compile his own kernel for that?
I'd add it to GENERIC because I, too, think this issue is purely theorical
for now. But I don't have a strong feeling about this. As long as I can
build a kernel that can run netbsd-3 or/and netbsd-4 userland from the future
netbsd-5 branch I'm happy :)
Manuel Bouyer <bouyer%antioche.eu.org@localhost>
NetBSD: 26 ans d'experience feront toujours la difference
Main Index |
Thread Index |