[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: ataraid(4) and VOP_OPENing the same block device
On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 3:26 AM, Thor Lancelot Simon
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 02:51:27PM -0700, Bill Stouder-Studenmund wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 05:09:52AM +0200, Quentin Garnier wrote:
>> > IIUC, the controller allows you to slice disks: e.g., take two halves
>> > out of each, build a RAID1 with one set, and a RAID0 with the other. In
>> > this case both disks belong to each array.
>> Then the right thing to do is somehow export those slices. It makes sense
>> that different slices can be in different RAIDS, but any given slice
>> should be in only one.
> Yes. What concerns me is that I'd thought Elad had added code to the
> security policy which would in fact make it impossible to use one slice
> twice like this -- I'm not sure why what Juan is doing now works.
I think you're referring to sysdisk(9):
which never went in, and (probably) was able to enforce the policy
you're talking about.
Main Index |
Thread Index |