[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: rfc: fcntl() error reporting
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 9:38 PM, Bill Stouder-Studenmund
> You'll have more luck getting the results you want testing operation codes
> 2147483647 and below.
Yep, the FS related stuff is bypass if the most significant bit is set.
Thanks all for discussion. Indeed, the fcntl() standard description
allows to manipulate with command argument, but doesn't describe
anything about custom error signaling.
With Best Regards,
Main Index |
Thread Index |