tech-kern archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: rfc: fcntl() error reporting

On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 6:55 PM, Simon Burge <> 
> Does section B.2.3 of
> give
> us freedom here to report those extra errno values?
If a command value, f.e. -2, not valid, it doesn't, because the
ERRORS: section contains "shall" is mandatory. And in that section the
invalid command causes EINVAL.
Am I wrong?

With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index